<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2009/03/28/professor-eric-clemons-time-for-some-new-senior-vice-presidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2009/03/28/professor-eric-clemons-time-for-some-new-senior-vice-presidents/</link> <description>Digital Strategy Solutions, Change Management Leadership, Business Speaker, Payments Technology Convergence</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: David Dalka</title><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2009/03/28/professor-eric-clemons-time-for-some-new-senior-vice-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-41263</link> <dc:creator>David Dalka</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/?p=880#comment-41263</guid> <description>Eric,
Thanks for the reply. This is where you (and your friends are out of date), you stated: &quot;One is getting new customers. The other is being found by customers who are already looking for you.&quot;
Customers aren&#039;t looking for *YOU*. Potential prospects are looking for attributes of products and services or trying to solve a problem that they have. To understand how radical a shift that is you&#039;d have to understand search marketing fully.
Silly? Silly is doing the same old brand marketing when it&#039;s not your most effective channel - not by a long shot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p><p>Thanks for the reply. This is where you (and your friends are out of date), you stated: &#8220;One is getting new customers. The other is being found by customers who are already looking for you.&#8221;</p><p>Customers aren&#8217;t looking for *YOU*. Potential prospects are looking for attributes of products and services or trying to solve a problem that they have. To understand how radical a shift that is you&#8217;d have to understand search marketing fully.</p><p>Silly? Silly is doing the same old brand marketing when it&#8217;s not your most effective channel &#8211; not by a long shot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric K. Clemons</title><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2009/03/28/professor-eric-clemons-time-for-some-new-senior-vice-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-41256</link> <dc:creator>Eric K. Clemons</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:40:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/?p=880#comment-41256</guid> <description>Not surprisingly, I consider this quite silly, since I am the author of the piece that cited these company officers.  Polite, reasoned even, but silly.  These officers are sharp enough to realize that there are at least two parts to customer acquisition.  One is getting new customers.  The other is being found by customers who are already looking for you.  Google can pretty much charge whatever it wants for access to customers who are already looking for you.  The DoJ took a very dim view of this 20 years ago when airline reservations systems had the power to bankrupt an airline.  The officers I have worked with understand acquisition.  They also understand extortion.  We can discuss this offline if you wish.  But I hope never to have to explain my last post again.  And, again, thanks for writing a relatively calm and reasoned piece in an environment where that was all too rare.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not surprisingly, I consider this quite silly, since I am the author of the piece that cited these company officers.  Polite, reasoned even, but silly.  These officers are sharp enough to realize that there are at least two parts to customer acquisition.  One is getting new customers.  The other is being found by customers who are already looking for you.  Google can pretty much charge whatever it wants for access to customers who are already looking for you.  The DoJ took a very dim view of this 20 years ago when airline reservations systems had the power to bankrupt an airline.  The officers I have worked with understand acquisition.  They also understand extortion.  We can discuss this offline if you wish.  But I hope never to have to explain my last post again.  And, again, thanks for writing a relatively calm and reasoned piece in an environment where that was all too rare.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents? &#171; Chicago Internet Marketing</title><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2009/03/28/professor-eric-clemons-time-for-some-new-senior-vice-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-41253</link> <dc:creator>Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents? &#171; Chicago Internet Marketing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:12:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/?p=880#comment-41253</guid> <description>[...] Re&#173;ad m&#173;o&#173;re&#173; he&#173;re&#173;:  Pro&#173;f&#173;esso&#173;r Eri&#173;c Cl&#173;emo&#173;n&#173;s: T&#173;i&#173;me f&#173;o&#173;r S... [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re&#173;ad m&#173;o&#173;re&#173; he&#173;re&#173;:  Pro&#173;f&#173;esso&#173;r Eri&#173;c Cl&#173;emo&#173;n&#173;s: T&#173;i&#173;me f&#173;o&#173;r S&#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents? &#124; thetopmarketingsecrets</title><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2009/03/28/professor-eric-clemons-time-for-some-new-senior-vice-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-41252</link> <dc:creator>Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents? &#124; thetopmarketingsecrets</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:50:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/?p=880#comment-41252</guid> <description>[...] Read more from the original source:  Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source:  Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents?</title><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2009/03/28/professor-eric-clemons-time-for-some-new-senior-vice-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-41251</link> <dc:creator>Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:42:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/?p=880#comment-41251</guid> <description>[...] more here: Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents?        Category : [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: Professor Eric Clemons: Time for Some New Senior Vice Presidents?        Category : [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
