Comments on: Gina Bianchini, CEO of Ning at AlwaysOn Stanford http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/08/03/gina-bianchini-ceo-of-ning-at-alwayson-stanford/ Digital Strategy Solutions, Change Management Leadership, Business Speaker, Payments Technology Convergence Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:11:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: David Scott Lewishttp://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/08/03/gina-bianchini-ceo-of-ning-at-alwayson-stanford/comment-page-1/#comment-32471 David Scott Lewis Sat, 04 Aug 2007 01:11:43 +0000 http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/08/03/gina-bianchini-ceo-of-ning-at-alwayson-stanford/#comment-32471 Depends on how this is defined. But I agree with the need for Ning. And I've got to say this (somewhere): She gave an absolutely delightful presentation at the AO Stanford Summit. Finally, as Kim Polese was to the 1990's, Gina is to this decade; going a step further, I consider her stage presence to be charismatic and magnetic, and not just because she's beautiful. I'd bet on Gina; she'll make Ning a winner. Depends on how this is defined. But I agree with the need for Ning.

And I’ve got to say this (somewhere): She gave an absolutely delightful presentation at the AO Stanford Summit. Finally, as Kim Polese was to the 1990′s, Gina is to this decade; going a step further, I consider her stage presence to be charismatic and magnetic, and not just because she’s beautiful.

I’d bet on Gina; she’ll make Ning a winner.

]]> By: Pete Prestipinohttp://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/08/03/gina-bianchini-ceo-of-ning-at-alwayson-stanford/comment-page-1/#comment-32469 Pete Prestipino Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:14:13 +0000 http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/08/03/gina-bianchini-ceo-of-ning-at-alwayson-stanford/#comment-32469 I agree with this because millions, nay trillions, of social networks already exist. No man (or woman) is an island - we each have multiple "networks" that we participate in and share information through - family, friends, work. These micro-networks are very influential for those within them. I agree with this because millions, nay trillions, of social networks already exist. No man (or woman) is an island – we each have multiple “networks” that we participate in and share information through – family, friends, work. These micro-networks are very influential for those within them.

]]>