<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Splog Indexed In Google, Using Blogger, Not Linking to the Source</title> <atom:link href="http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/05/11/splog-indexed-in-google-using-blogger-not-linking-to-the-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/05/11/splog-indexed-in-google-using-blogger-not-linking-to-the-source/</link> <description>Digital Strategy Solutions, Change Management Leadership, Business Speaker, Payments Technology Convergence</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Blogger Hasn&#8217;t Removed Other Blogs Violating Copyright</title><link>http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/05/11/splog-indexed-in-google-using-blogger-not-linking-to-the-source/comment-page-1/#comment-32576</link> <dc:creator>Blogger Hasn&#8217;t Removed Other Blogs Violating Copyright</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:38:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.daviddalka.com/createvalue/2007/05/11/splog-indexed-in-google-using-blogger-not-linking-to-the-source/#comment-32576</guid> <description>[...] On May 11, I wrote a post about a large splog hosted on the Blogger platform.  Why hasn&#8217;t the Blogger team removed this splog yet? Why aren&#8217;t they being proactive when my Feedburner panel clearly shows this as an uncommon use? Why is Blogger apparently only responding to the requests of companies with significant legal teams? When will Blogger protect the interests of all blog content equally? [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On May 11, I wrote a post about a large splog hosted on the Blogger platform.  Why hasn&#8217;t the Blogger team removed this splog yet? Why aren&#8217;t they being proactive when my Feedburner panel clearly shows this as an uncommon use? Why is Blogger apparently only responding to the requests of companies with significant legal teams? When will Blogger protect the interests of all blog content equally? [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
